In the legal dispute over leaked iOS 26 design details, YouTuber Jon Prosser continues to refuse to fully cooperate with Apple. The company now intends to seek a court order to compel the release of evidence.
Apple has been pursuing legal action against YouTuber Jon Prosser and his associate Michael Ramacciotti since July 2025. The accusation: The two allegedly gained unauthorized access to a developer iPhone and disclosed confidential details about the operating system, then known as iOS 19 – months before Apple unveiled iOS 26 with its Liquid Glass design at WWDC 2025. A status report filed yesterday indicates that the case is far from over.
According to the joint status report filed with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Prosser has responded incompletely or not at all to several discovery requests from Apple. Apple has repeatedly extended the deadlines and stated that it still has not received the necessary information. The company now intends to seek an order from the court in the Northern District of Ohio to compel Prosser to cooperate.
How this happened
The background: According to Apple's lawsuit, Ramacciotti gained access to a developer iPhone belonging to former Apple software engineer Ethan Lipnik while Lipnik was away. Ramacciotti allegedly then showed Prosser the contents of the device via FaceTime, whereupon Prosser published videos on his YouTube channel featuring recreated renderings of the new iOS design.
Lipnik was fired by Apple for failing to comply with company policies regarding the security of development equipment. Prosser had a default judgment issued against him in October 2025 after missing the deadline to respond to the lawsuit. He has since announced his intention to hire a lawyer and challenge the default judgment.
Different strategies of the defendants
The contrast between the two defendants is striking. While Prosser is delaying cooperation, Ramacciotti is working much more actively with Apple. He has provided Apple with another device for forensic examination, promised to supplement his answers to Apple's questions, and is generally more cooperative.
For Prosser, the strategy is risky: Should the court grant the order requested by Apple and Prosser continue to refuse to cooperate, he faces severe sanctions – from fines to a conviction for contempt of court.
Apple vs. Jon Prosser: What's at stake
The case has far-reaching implications for the entire Apple leaker community. With this lawsuit, Apple is signaling its willingness to take legal action against the disclosure of confidential information – not only against employees who share data, but also against those who publish it. Whether the case will lead to a precedent-setting ruling or end in a settlement is likely to be decided in the coming months. (Image: Shutterstock / Sittipol sukuna)
- Analysts: Apple sacrifices margin for growth – Mac user base could double
- Amazon acquires Globalstar: Apple Satellite Services switch to Amazon Leo
- What Analysts expect from Apple's Q2 2026
- Hackers are attacking iCloud backups via fake Apple websites
- iOS 26.5 Beta 2: Apple continues testing phase
- Apple's AI chief John Giannandrea is leaving the Company
- Mac mini & Mac Studio: Apple stops orders for some models
- Apple becomes smartphone market leader for the first time in a first quarter
- Apple showcases AI and AirPods Pro 3 Research at CHI 2026
- WhatsApp brings Status Updates to the Chats tab
- FBI recovered deleted Signal Messages via iPhone Database
- Mac sales grow by 9 percent and outperform the PC market
- OpenAI halves the price of ChatGPT Pro – with a focus on Codex
- macOS 26.4.1 released: Bug fixes for the Mac
- Apple Intelligence vulnerable to prompt injection attacks
- Apple requests Samsung Data in US Antitrust Case
- iOS 26.4.1 activates Theft Protection on Company iPhones
- Self-Service Repair: New parts for MacBook Neo & Co.
- iOS 26.4.1 fixes serious iCloud sync bug
- iPhone dominates Smartphone Ranking: Five Models in the Top 10
- iOS 26.4.1 is here: Apple releases bugfix Update
