This article may contain affiliate links. Learn more on our Partner Program page.
Behind the record-breaking lawsuit against Apple is an investor who is now revealing what's at stake for him. Nearly a quarter of the $5.7 billion would go to him – provided Apple ever pays the sum. His own statement, however, reads as remarkably restrained.
On September 25, a jury in San Diego ordered Apple to pay more than $5.7 billion in damages, alleging that the Taptic Engine infringed on two patents held by Taction Technology. Three days later, a party not involved in the trial, Burford Capital, a company listed on the London and New York stock exchanges that finances legal proceedings and receives a share of the settlement if the case is successful, came forward.
In a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on September 28, Burford quantifies its claim arising from the proceedings. The company only mentions the case itself indirectly, referring to media coverage: it points out that a ruling in the case of Taction Technology v. Apple was publicly reported. Burford also justifies the disclosure with this media coverage – it does not change its practice of not disclosing individual cases.
Key Facts at a Glance
- If Apple were to pay the judgment unchanged, Burford Capital would be entitled to approximately $1.4 billion.
- This corresponds to just under a quarter of the sum awarded by the jury.
- The claim is divided roughly equally between Burford's own balance sheet and its investment funds.
- Burford himself warns that major patent rulings rarely survive subsequent legal proceedings unchanged.
- Apple denies the patent infringement and has announced an appeal.
Nearly a quarter of the record sum
Burford claims a $1.4 billion settlement if the payment remains unchanged. According to the statement, roughly half of this would be on its own balance sheet, and the other half on funds Burford manages for investors. Compared to the $5.7 billion awarded in the judgment, this represents just under 25 percent.
| Position | Amount |
|---|---|
| According to the jury, damages were awarded | $5.7 billion |
| Burford's claim upon full payment | $1.4 billion |
| of which own balance sheet | about half |
| of which investment funds | about half |
| share in the verdict | almost 25 percent |
According to Burford, the final amount received also depends on the terms of the financing agreement, as well as fees, costs, and taxes. The company explicitly does not rule out the possibility of a total loss.
How the financiers became visible in the proceedings
That Taction was not litigating alone was already known before the announcement. According to a report by Bloomberg Law, the evidence presented in the proceedings revealed that the lawsuit was financed by two companies, Gronostaj Investments and Kenosha Investments. Kenosha was identified in another legal dispute as an indirect subsidiary of Burford.
Apple had tried for years to disclose this connection. In July 2023, the presiding judge even threatened the investors in the Apple case with sanctions. With the SEC filing, Burford himself now confirms his financial stake in the outcome.
The disclosure had an immediate impact on the stock market: According to a Reuters report, Burford shares, traded in New York, were up more than six percent on Monday morning.
A financier who warns against his own success
It is noteworthy how much Burford downplays its own figure. The statement indicates that the total is likely to change in the proceedings following the trial or on appeal. Apple will request the trial court to overturn the jury's verdict, and the Federal Circuit, as the patent appeals court, is known to scrutinize large judgments.
According to Burford, very few major patent judgments survive this process unchanged, and it is a lengthy process. The ruling is neither a legally binding judgment nor a payment receipt. Moreover, Burford states that proceedings often end with settlements significantly lower than the judgment – a settlement for a considerably smaller sum is also possible. Should settlement negotiations take place, the company may not comment until after their conclusion.
Why the 1.4 billion will remain a figure for now
The announcement shifts the perception of the proceedings. On the other side is not just a haptics specialist from San Diego, but a financier for whom a sum in the billions is at stake. The fact that this financier is so significantly tempering expectations, in our view, is the real signal: he himself anticipates that the $5.7 billion figure will still change.
The lengthy process of such a case is illustrated by the dispute with Masimo. There, a jury ordered Apple to pay $634 million in November 2025, and it wasn't until July 2026 that the judge rejected Apple's request for a retrial. The Taction case is still at the stage of this process. For iPhones and Apple Watches, the dispute has no practical consequences. The Taptic Engine continues to generate all tactile feedback from the devices, and an iPhone that vibrates seemingly without reason is unrelated to the case.
Should investors who profit from a lawsuit be required to disclose their involvement from the outset – or is that solely the responsibility of the plaintiff company? Let us know in the comments where you would draw the line.
